Introducing Alfred Evidence, owners, and decisions ready for the next request. See what Alfred connects

Find the attack paths that deserve action

Validate exploitable risk across applications, cloud, APIs, and identity, then give technical owners the evidence and priorities to close it.

The business pressureName what must change.
01

Too many unvalidated findings

Automated tools flag weaknesses without establishing whether they combine into a plausible attack path.

02

An attack surface that keeps changing

Applications, APIs, cloud services, identities, and integrations create new entry points between review cycles.

03

Reports stop at severity

Technical ratings arrive without the evidence, affected business function, or remediation dependencies needed to sequence work.

01 · What we deliver

What we build and leave working.

We begin with the risk or business result that must change. The engagement then produces technical work, named ownership, and evidence your team can keep using.

01 · Deliverable

Rules of engagement

Authorized targets, test identities, permitted techniques, excluded actions, contacts, stop conditions, and evidence handling rules.

02 · Deliverable

Attack surface map

Exposed services, interfaces, identities, trust relationships, dependencies, and candidate entry paths.

03 · Deliverable

Manual penetration test

Controlled attempts to exploit and combine weaknesses within the authorized boundary.

04 · Deliverable

Validated finding record

Reproduction steps, evidence, affected assets, attack path, plausible impact, and relevant safeguards.

Evidence you can use

Evidence your team can use after delivery.

Each output identifies its source, owner, review point, and next action so the work stays traceable after handoff.

What you receive
  • Rules of engagement
  • Attack surface map
  • Manual penetration test
  • Validated finding record
How it stays useful
Source
Current source material
Owner
Named owner
Timing
Relevant period
Status
Review status and decision
02 · The Open method

From business pressure to working security.

Four stages connect the immediate need to implementation. Each stage ends with a decision, an owner, and a visible output.

01 · Context

Frame

Define the business objective, key risks, stakeholders, current state, and evidence already available. We agree what must change and how progress will be measured.

02 · Plan

Design

Translate the objective into right-sized controls, technical priorities, ownership, and a sequence that fits how the organization works.

03 · Implementation

Execute

Work alongside accountable teams to build, configure, document, test, and resolve. Decisions and evidence are captured as part of delivery.

04 · Continuity

Sustain

Establish the review cadence, signals, handoffs, and evidence routines that keep the capability useful as systems, people, and requirements change.

03 · Clear roles

Keep authority clear at every handoff.

Open leads the agreed work. Your team keeps management decisions. Independent reviewers and qualified specialists retain the authority only they can hold.

01 · How Open leads

Open leads the work

We lead the work, surface decisions early, and make progress easy to see. The mix of leadership, engineering, and program operations is tailored to the need.

02 · How your team leads

Business decisions stay yours

Your leaders own risk choices, resources, systems, and approval of policies or controls. We bring context and make action easier.

03 · When assurance follows

Build and verify stay separate

When objective review is needed, delivery and assessment roles stay separate. We confirm that structure before we begin.

Business results

What changes after the work.

The result should change what the team can do next: reduce exposure, operate a stronger control, answer scrutiny, or make a decision with better evidence.

01 · Outcome

Noise is separated from exposure

Teams can distinguish validated paths from alerts that were not demonstrated.

02 · Outcome

Repairs have technical context

Owners understand the sequence, conditions, and affected assets behind each finding.

03 · Outcome

Risk decisions retain evidence

Leaders can review what was tested, observed, and limited.

Common questions

What to settle before work starts.

Direct answers on fit, timing, responsibilities, deliverables, and the next commercial step.

How is this different from a vulnerability scan?

A scan identifies potential weaknesses at scale. A penetration test uses manual analysis and controlled exploitation within an authorized target.

How is production testing controlled?

Rules define techniques, windows, rate limits where relevant, contacts, stop conditions, and excluded actions. Testers pause on unexpected impact.

Can you test applications, APIs, cloud, and identity?

Yes, when the targets are owned or explicitly authorized by the client and included in scope.

What does the report include?

It includes scope, method, constraints, attack surface summary, validated findings, evidence, remediation considerations, and unresolved uncertainty.

Test the exposure that matters most

Define the target, business consequence, and safety boundaries for a focused test.