Build the security. Prove it works. Keep moving.
When a deal, audit, regulation, or incident puts the business under pressure, Open turns the requirement into stronger controls, independently examined evidence, and a clear next step. Open Cybersecurity builds. Open Assurance examines. Alfred keeps the context connected.
Tell us what must move, by when, and what you already have. We will identify the first decision and the work needed to support it.
Organizations that work with Open.
Client logos can be scrolled horizontally.
Three disciplines.
One company accountable for the path.
Start with what is blocking the business. Add only the discipline the decision requires.
Open Cybersecurity
Provides senior security leadership and hands-on delivery across GRC, cloud, product, testing, incidents, and privacy.
Open Assurance
Independently examines controls, technology, suppliers, and governance so stakeholders can see what the evidence supports.
Alfred
Keeps approved requirements, evidence, owners, and decisions connected across the tools your team already uses.
What needs to move now?
Choose the event closest to yours. Each path shows what Open can do and where to begin.
A buyer asks for SOC 2 or security evidence
Identify the real requirement, close the gaps, and prepare evidence without turning the request into a new program.
Choose the framework path →Security decisions have no clear owner
Add senior direction, decision rights, reporting, and a plan teams can execute.
See security leadership →A product or cloud change raises exposure
Review architecture, test exposure, and put practical controls into the delivery path before release.
See cloud and product security →A claim needs an independent examination
Agree the question and criteria, examine the evidence, and show leaders what can responsibly be relied upon.
Choose an assurance service →Know what the engagement will produce.
Every engagement begins with a business requirement and ends with defined work your team can operate, examine, or carry into the next review.
See the complete engagement path
What your team can do next.
Act on the risk, answer the review, and reuse the work when the next requirement arrives.
Map overlapping requirements to one control environment while preserving the criteria each review needs.
Show who is responsibleKeep management, delivery, independent examination, legal advice, and formal issuance visibly distinct.
Start the next review aheadCarry forward current evidence, prior decisions, owners, and open actions instead of reconstructing them.
Service Partner · Latin America
Vanta's #1 MSP in LATAM.
The regional designation is supported by approved Vanta partner-program documentation held by Open and verified in September 2026. Vanta's public directory separately lists Open Cybersecurity as a Service Partner.
See the Vanta partnershipOne control environment. Multiple review paths.
Open maps overlapping requirements to the controls and evidence your teams already operate, then prepares each framework for its correct external review.
Choose a framework pathPrepare a defensible control story and the evidence another party will need to examine.
→ ISO 27001Information security managementTurn policy, ownership, risk treatment, and review into a management system that operates.
→ ISO 42001AI management and governanceConnect AI use, lifecycle decisions, risk, human oversight, and evidence of accountable operation.
→ LGPDData responsibility in practiceTranslate privacy obligations into decisions, ownership, security controls, and operational evidence.
→Answer the next request from work already done.
Alfred sits beside Vanta, ticketing, cloud, identity, and document systems. It connects approved answers, evidence, owners, and prior decisions so a new buyer or audit request starts with what is current. Existing systems remain authoritative. A person approves every material answer.
See what Alfred connectsStraight answers before the call.
What Open does, where responsibility stays, and how to begin.
What happens in the first conversation?
Bring the trigger, deadline, people involved, and evidence already in hand. Open will identify the most useful starting point, the responsible discipline, and what a first scope should produce.
Can Open build and independently examine the same program?
Open can provide both capabilities through clearly separated roles. Open Cybersecurity builds and operates. Open Assurance examines relevant evidence when objectivity is required. We agree the boundary before work begins.
We already use Vanta or another GRC platform. What does Alfred add?
Your platform remains the system of record. Alfred connects the approved evidence, owners, reasoning, and prior decisions around it so each request begins with current context. It does not decide, certify, or remove human approval.
Can one program support more than one framework?
Yes. Controls and evidence can be reused where criteria genuinely overlap, while each formal review keeps its own scope, requirements, and professional boundaries.
