Use cases spread faster than inventory
Models, features, vendor services, and employee tools appear without a complete record of purpose, data, impact, or sponsor.
Open Assurance · Verify
Know whether AI governance operates beyond policy
Examine decision rights, lifecycle controls, human oversight, and evidence across material AI use cases.
The business pressureName what must change.
Evaluation is hard to interpret
Testing exists, but criteria, data, limits, approval, and deployment relevance are not evident.
Responsibility fragments
Product, engineering, data, legal, privacy, security, procurement, and business each control part of the lifecycle.
01 · What we deliver
What we examine and report.
We begin with the decision the intended user needs to make. The work then shows what the evidence supports, where gaps remain, and what requires action.
AI assurance terms
Selected use cases, lifecycle stages, entities, criteria, evidence, period, exclusions, and report users.
Use case evidence profile
Purpose, affected users, sponsor, model and data dependencies, deployment, human involvement, and known limits.
Governance examination
Independent review of intake, classification, authority, approvals, exceptions, escalation, reporting, and oversight.
Lifecycle evidence examination
Review of selected sourcing, data, design, evaluation, release, monitoring, change, incident, and retirement records.
AI assurance findings
Observed conditions, evidence, affected objective, dependency, significance, and limitation.
Independent AI assurance report
Scope, method, use case observations, findings, limitations, and management decisions required.
Evidence you can use
Evidence your team can use after delivery.
Each output identifies its source, owner, review point, and next action so the work stays traceable after handoff.
What you receive
- AI assurance terms
- Use case evidence profile
- Governance examination
- Lifecycle evidence examination
- AI assurance findings
- Independent AI assurance report
How it stays useful
- Source
- Current source material
- Owner
- Named owner
- Timing
- Relevant period
- Status
- Review status and decision
02 · The Open method
From a precise question to a usable conclusion.
The question, evidence, testing, and conclusion remain easy to follow. Leaders can see what was examined, what was found, and how the result should be used.
Define
Agree the decision, audience, subject, expectations, timing, dependencies, and type of review before testing begins.
Examine
Review the relevant records, configurations, conversations, and technical evidence. We test whether it is current, reliable, and sufficient for the question.
Challenge
Follow exceptions, conflicting evidence, and gaps. The conclusion follows what the work shows, not the preferred story.
Communicate
Explain findings, implications, uncertainty, and the next decision in language the audience can use.
03 · Clear roles
Keep authority clear at every handoff.
Open leads the agreed work. Your team keeps management decisions. Independent reviewers and qualified specialists retain the authority only they can hold.
One clear assurance question
Before we begin, we confirm the question, evidence, review approach, audience, and reporting format. Any change remains visible.
Management keeps ownership
Your team remains responsible for systems, controls, records, remediation, and the information it provides. We examine; we do not take over management decisions.
Use the right qualified provider
If law or a professional standard requires a licensed or accredited report, we make the qualified delivery path clear from the start.
Business results
What changes after the work.
The result should change what the team can do next: reduce exposure, operate a stronger control, answer scrutiny, or make a decision with better evidence.
Oversight connects to use cases
Leaders see how governance applies to selected models, products, vendors, data, and affected users.
Evaluation retains context
Results include criteria, data, deployment relevance, limitations, and approval records.
Lifecycle gaps become specific
Teams can locate missing records across sourcing, release, monitoring, change, and retirement.
Common questions
What to settle before work starts.
Direct answers on fit, timing, responsibilities, deliverables, and the next commercial step.
Which AI uses should be examined first?
Prioritize uses affecting people, important decisions, sensitive data, critical operations, customers, or fast changing suppliers.
What evidence is relevant?
Use case inventories, impact assessments, data records, evaluation plans and results, approvals, vendor documents, monitoring, incidents, and change records.
How do you examine third party AI?
We connect vendor evidence and terms to actual use, data, configuration, monitoring, and fallback arrangements.
Does the work evaluate model performance?
It can examine how evaluations are governed. Independent technical testing needs explicit criteria, data, access, methods, and scope.
Is this certification or a safety guarantee?
No. It does not certify a model or organization, guarantee performance, or replace legal and regulatory interpretation.
Open Assurance
Test how AI governance works in practice
Bring the use cases, governance claims, and stakeholders that need an independent view.