Fragmented ownership
Personal-data decisions need clear roles across business, privacy, security, and technology.
Framework readiness · Open
Move LGPD from policy to accountable operations
Connect personal data obligations to real owners, security controls, supplier decisions, response workflows, and current evidence.
Requirements and review pressureKnow what must be ready before review begins.
Incomplete records
Without usable records, teams struggle to explain processing and safeguard decisions.
Operational delay
Rights requests, incidents, vendors, and changes need defined routes for action.
What comes first
Start with the requirement and the decision it must support.
We identify what applies, which systems and teams it touches, and the evidence needed for the next review.
Understand processing
Map data categories, purposes, systems, owners, recipients, and lifecycle events.
Assign accountability
Define decision rights, escalation paths, and records for material activities.
Build usable controls
Embed safeguards and privacy workflows into the teams that operate them.
Maintain evidence
Keep decisions, reviews, and technical assurance artifacts available for scrutiny.
Evidence you can use
Prepare evidence for the next review.
Useful evidence has a clear source, owner, timing, and review status. That makes it easier to understand, reuse, and act on.
What you receive
- Clearer privacy operations
- Better evidence discipline
- Connected security work
How it stays useful
- Source
- Current source material
- Owner
- Named owner
- Timing
- Relevant period
- Status
- Review status and decision
Readiness path
Move from requirements to working readiness.
Each stage turns the standard into owned work, current evidence, and a clear next decision.
Map
Document relevant processing, systems, owners, and external dependencies.
Assess
Review operational practices, controls, evidence, and technical safeguards.
Improve
Prioritize practical workflows for privacy governance and risk treatment.
Sustain
Test selected controls and maintain records for ongoing review.
Where Open can help
Choose the capability that resolves the immediate pressure.
Add related work only when it improves the result. Independent review remains separate when the decision requires it.
Business results
Know what becomes possible after the work.
Each result describes a practical change the team can operate, explain, or use in its next decision.
Clearer privacy operations
Teams can follow consistent workflows for core data-protection activities.
Better evidence discipline
Records and control artifacts are more accessible to accountable owners.
Connected security work
Technical safeguards are linked more clearly to processing risks and operations.
Common questions
Resolve fit, responsibility, and timing before work begins.
Straight answers on who does what, which formal path applies, and what a useful first engagement should produce.
Can Open certify LGPD compliance?
No. Open does not certify LGPD compliance or make legal determinations.
Who interprets LGPD obligations?
Qualified Brazilian privacy counsel advises on legal interpretation. The controller or otherwise responsible organization retains accountability and owns operational responses, transfer decisions, rights handling, and regulator engagement.
What does Open operationalize?
Established requirements through data maps, owners, privacy workflows, safeguards, evidence, testing, and remediation.
Can Open act as our encarregado?
No. Open supports program work but does not serve as the organization's appointed encarregado.
Does technical testing prove compliance?
No. Testing can evaluate selected safeguards but cannot establish lawful processing or overall LGPD compliance.
