Unknown data practices
Teams cannot govern processing they have not mapped, assigned, and reviewed.
Once the responsible organization establishes the applicable requirements with advice from qualified privacy counsel, Open maps processing, assigns owners, strengthens controls, and organizes records for review.
Teams cannot govern processing they have not mapped, assigned, and reviewed.
Privacy commitments need supporting operational and technical safeguards.
Requests, incidents, vendors, and changes require coordinated decision paths.
We identify what applies, which systems and teams it touches, and the evidence needed for the next review.
Identify purposes, data categories, systems, recipients, owners, and lifecycle events.
Connect decisions, records, reviews, and exceptions to accountable roles.
Make privacy workflows usable for product, support, security, and vendor teams.
Validate selected security and process controls that support data protection practices.
Useful evidence has a clear source, owner, timing, and review status. That makes it easier to understand, reuse, and act on.
Each stage turns the standard into owned work, current evidence, and a clear next decision.
Map processing activities, roles, systems, vendors, and material data flows.
Identify operational, control, evidence, and technical gaps.
Improve workflows for governance, requests, vendors, changes, and incidents.
Test selected safeguards and maintain evidence for ongoing review.
Add related work only when it improves the result. Independent review remains separate when the decision requires it.
Each result describes a practical change the team can operate, explain, or use in its next decision.
Teams can locate data practices, roles, records, and dependencies more readily.
Privacy and security work is integrated into relevant business workflows.
Assurance materials are organized around accountable, operating processes.
Straight answers on who does what, which formal path applies, and what a useful first engagement should produce.
No. Open does not certify GDPR compliance or make legal determinations.
Qualified privacy counsel advises on legal interpretation. The controller or otherwise responsible organization retains accountability and owns operational responses, transfer decisions, rights handling, and regulator engagement.
Established requirements through processing maps, owners, workflows, controls, evidence, testing, and remediation.
No. Open can support the program but does not act as the organization's data protection officer or legal representative.
No. Scoped testing can evaluate selected safeguards but cannot establish lawful processing or overall GDPR compliance.
Bring the requirement, target review, current scope, and evidence already in hand. We will identify the first readiness decision and the work required before review.